Thursday, August 28, 2014

Ebola Virus in 2014

[Dangers of the Modern World]

Long have I pondered and even conceptualized a post-apocalyptic world - natural disasters, global economic collapses, the ever-popular zombie hordes, but not Ebola.

The Ebola virus is something else entirely. It's incredibly deadly with a 50-90% mortality rate and although it is not an airborne virus much like SARS it is still extremely contagious through food, fluids (even semen) and close contact. Since its discovery in 1976 there have been at least 7-8 major outbreaks, but none as bad as the current 2014 one, which the World Health Organization now estimates at least 20,000 being infected before it can be properly contained due to dense pockets of population, lack of education and knowledge, and poor infrastructure in parts of West Africa.

Looking back at August 1976
In Zaire (now the Democratic Republic of the Congo) the first recorded victim - village school headmaster Mabalo Lokela was touring an area near the Central African Republic border along the Ebola River (from which the virus is named). On September 8th he died from the disease first thought to be the similar Marburg virus. After the WHO had helped contain the Ebola virus infection there was 318 cases and 280 deaths in Zaire - a mortality rate of 88%.

The 2013/2014 current outbreak is only the second case of the Ebola virus infecting over a country's borders, the first time being in 2001-2002 between Gabon and Republic of Congo, which also marked the first time the virus had been recorded in the current country of the Congo.
 
From: http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2014/07/31/world/africa/ebola-virus-outbreak-qa.html

Not only is this the worst outbreak of the Ebola (EBOV strain) virus in terms of pure number of cases and deaths, it's also the fastest and widest-spreading outbreak thus far of any of the  known strains. It's been reported in four countries in West Africa with an overall mortality rate of 64% with over 3,000 deaths (as of late August 2014). Although the chances of the infection spreading outside of the African continent is somewhat limited it is still a possibility via air or sea transport as the symptoms sometimes don't present themselves until a couple weeks after initial transmission.

Most First World countries do have multiple fail-safes in place to prevent massive epidemics as well as the ability to transmit news and media very quickly (if the government is operating correctly, that is). In the United States the CDC and military have multiple planned scenarios and fail-safes, but still you never know...

Public awareness is of the utmost importance on a local and global scale when events like this take place. In the U.S. especially it's too easy to pass over an internet article or change the channel on TV when news like this comes up. People need to take an active interest as the whole zombie sub-culture has historically shown that a lack of public awareness will inevitably be the end of us all. Quite frankly something like this has already happened due to a long period of little to no public awareness in the U.S. Can you guess what it was? How about a little thing called HIV? By the time HIV\AIDS was properly understood it was basically too late. As of now the death toll is over 30 million and growing.

Like times of specific flu (ex. H1N1) strains being prevalent being extra hygienic is always important. Wash your hands as much as possible, don't share food or drink and generally be careful with close contact with others. As I mentioned earlier the five known strains of Ebola are not airborne, but if someone coughs hard enough they will expel saliva which could contain the virus if they were infected so be weary. Basic rule of thumb would be to take the precautions everyone followed during the 2009 Swine Flu pandemic, which killed 14,286 people globally and 3,642 in North America alone - one of which was a dear childhood friend of mine.

Be safe and be mindful of your surroundings and be aware of developing news.




Thursday, August 14, 2014

Endless Projects - Part III coming soon

Outdoor projects and cold weather preparations have been taking over lately... more on their developments soon.

Clearly Fiona is excited

Friday, August 1, 2014

Wood Stoves - Self Sufficiency

[Challenges of Heating an old New Englander ]

Long have I wished for owning a wood stove (or multiple wood stoves) and now that I have one I'm worried it isn't quite right for our house. In an oblong and quite frankly uniquely laid-out house heating is a big challenge.  The original 1858 house, was much smaller and simpler, but since then multiple add-ons (including the addition of a second floor about a hundred years ago) have made this house quite odd. The front room is a long, slightly narrow living room with 4 windows where we spend most of our time either relaxing, reading or watching TV. Quite frankly it's the perfect room to plop down a hearth and wood stove to cut oil usage during the winter, but... there lies a number of challenges. 

First and foremost the positioning of the wood stove would be a challenge due to the placement of the windows and existing baseboard heating AND on top of that (or rather, below that) the oil tank sits under this room. Second, there's two entrances to the living room - one on either end and I don't want to block or obstruct an exit. Third, the floor would need major reinforcing in order to support a 300+ lb. wood stove as well as a brick or stone hearth. Fourth, just the pure cost of the chimney that would have to be ported through the exterior wall.
  
Other than that it should be easy? Right? Ugh...

Besides the wood stove placement in our living we do have an existing fireplace on the opposite end of the house in a den-like room that is on a slab, rather than the house's original stone foundation. It's a small fireplace and hearth and it's cozy, but the chimney itself is built on the outside of the house, which is inherently inefficient due to the loss of heat outside of exterior walls. What would help mitigate this? A wood fireplace insert and the internal chimney that comes with it. What it comes down to these days is just pure cost effectiveness versus efficiency of the end product. Will a wood stove and wood fireplace insert eventually be worth the initial costs in the long run? Hard to say. More on this very soon...


Cozy, but sadly inefficient fireplace